We all understand that it takes many years of schooling to become a vet. additionally, we all have the brains and common sense to understand that pathology isn't black and white, even if we may be "common laypeople".
As somebody who had a dog that was misdiagnosed with chondrosarcoma, I also understand the possible tragic consequences of a misdiagnosis. A couple of years ago I took Loca to the vet because she seemed to be experiencing some discomfort when walking. The vet took x-rays and sent them to the radiologist at the University of Guelph vet school. He diagnosed her with chondrosarcoma. Thanks to this board, I knew to send the x-rays to OSU for a second opinion. Guess what? The radiologist mistook normal lung superimposed on clavicle as bone cancer!!!! We send a second set of x-rays to OSU; same findings.
Was the original radiologist looking after Loca's best interests? I'm confident that he was. Should he have been able to distinguish the difference between lung tissue superimposed on clavicle from bone cancer? I sure hope so.
I'm glad that this kind of situation is getting some press. We all count on our vets to do what's right, despite the fact that their patients can't talk or describe their symptoms. Hopefully a second, or maybe even third opinion will become more commonplace.